number of failed Content checkpoints) in the summary report are exactly double those in PAC 2 and in the PAC 3 detailed report. I have only detected one minor glitch in PAC 3 – the metrics (e.g. PAC 3 also seems more stable than PAC 2 – I tested a couple of files that crashed PAC 2 but not PAC 3. The Screen Reader Preview seems slightly improved, with images displayed smaller than in PAC 2. The ability to produce a summary test report in accessible PDF format is a very welcome new feature. PAC 3 has an improved user interface, in my opinion, and unlike PAC 2 is itself fully accessible to assistive technology users. PAC 3 Screen Shot (click for full size image)Īfter using PAC 3 in parallel with PAC 2 for a few weeks, as far as I have been able to tell the test functionality is identical – with the exception of the new check for assignment of header cells.
If this is neither German nor English, PAC will be executed in the English version. More specifically, the language automatically depends on the language set in the operating system of your computer.
0 kommentar(er)
